Monday, November 29, 2010

What's your perspective?

Recently I have been thinking about the importance of the origin of our thoughts to the conclusions that we draw.

For instance, how we determine value often time derives from the value of that we create in our own minds. For example, if someone were to break something that belonged to you, how would you respond? Your answer of course depends on 1 - who the person was, 2 - how valuable the item was, and 3 - the understood intent of the person who broke it. If it was your best friend who broke something very valuable to you, you might respond differently than if it were a complete stranger that broke something of little significance. Often we will attribute grace/mercy to those we value, and judgment/guilt to those who are "insignificant" to us.

How do we determine who is of value, and who is not? (You say, "I don't do that, everyone is of equal value", and I would reply that in fact you do place value on some over others because of the way you care for some and not for others. But that is a discussion for another day) It is in the origin of our thoughts that we determine who is valuable to us, and who is "less significant" to us. It does not mean we do not care about them, it just means that in the scope of life, they are not our primary concern.

I remember seeing this picture on a book belonging to one of the kids in my class in highschool. I used it because it represents an interesting point. Where in the picture is down? Depending on where you start will determine your conclusion.

In life, we see that this is often the way we handle situations, people, things, choices, etc. My perspective is the correct one and therefore is the measuring tool I use to evaluate everything. We all think this way - whether or not we want to believe it, it is how we think.

Some have come to the understanding that there is a final authority of evaluation that is outside of ourselves. Without an actual standard that is absolute, nothing is absolute. If everything depends on the perspective of the originator, then if left to our own, chaos must ensue because no matter how alike we think we might be with others, we still have a perspective that is distinct, therefore leading ultimately to different conclusions.

There is much more to say about the things going through my mind, but for now, I'd like to hear where you would go with what has been presented already.


Monday, November 22, 2010

What is the greatest gift I can give?

Is giving someone a Bible enough?

Last year I had the opportunity to go to Peru with a team of teenagers, and after handing Bibles out to the local people, the question was asked, "How are they going to understand what they are reading?"

Since then, I have had a conversation with a missionary with Wycliffe Translators, and he basically said the same thing. He thanked me for the ministry of AMG International because we go out and explain the Bible to those who receive it.

That got me thinking about what we believe about God's word. Does God's word stand alone? Can someone who knows nothing about God learn all they need to know just by reading the Bible? Is it essential for someone to explain to someone else what God's word means?

How we answer these questions says much about what we believe about the Bible and it's author. If I believe that the Bible is the actual words of God to man, if I believe that His Spirit illumines man to understand His Word, if I believe that the Author knew exactly what to write to show Himself to man, then I would conclude the the Word of God can and will stand alone. So giving the Bible to someone is a most excellent gift.

However, if I believe that it is from the mouth of man that another must understand the Bible, or that an uneducated person needs an educated person to explain it, or that the teachings of the Bible are too deep for someone to understand apart from a discourse from another, then I would conclude that the Word of God needs the mouth of man to be effective. Therefore, apart from someone to explain it, the Bible itself is not a sufficient gift.

What do you think?

Thursday, November 11, 2010

What do you think Paul looked like?


II Cor 11, Paul records for us his life in interesting detail...

  • far more labors
  • far more imprisonments
  • beaten times w/o number (often in danger of death)
  • 5 times - received 39 lashes
  • 3 times beaten with rods
  • Once stoned!
  • 3 times shipwrecked
  • he spent a day and a night in the ocean
My thought as I sat and read this today is - I wonder what Paul looked like. Follow this with me. Have you ever seen anyone beaten? Did their body ever fully recover? I've never seen anyone stoned (at least not in the Biblical sense), but if hit with rocks and left for dead, there had to be some head shots! Paul must have been a site for people to see!

Then he opens his mouth and shares the goodness of the gospel, the greatness of his Savior, the love of his master, the good news of following Jesus Christ. You think people may have wondered if this man was off his rocker? I mean really, what has following Jesus done for you? Your life hasn't been made easier. You have encountered numerous problems as a result of being a disciple of Jesus. Why would I want to follow Jesus? However something about his message called them to join in his struggles.

What kind of disciple am I? Would I continue in the faith if faced with the situations that Paul encountered? Would my message be a message of self protection or self sacrifice?

As I wonder what Paul looked like as he share with people about Jesus, I wonder what I look like as I talk with people about the very same good news.